Client R.
I considered my work with R. to have come to an end a few months ago but she doesn't feel the same and so, aside from considering that some things are only ended by sex and death, I have plodded along with her stale wishes. She says that her desire to continue therapy proves there are old dependencies and, therefore, the necessity of dealing with them. I am not unaware, of course, that in these winter months it is a peculiar thing to wear tops that reveal such a distinct outline to the nipple and it is this, rather then her own protests of dependency, that suggest a more cogent case for continuing our work. I will see her this morning and, assuredly, the ancient argument will arise for enacting desire, rather than it's articulation. Of course, the planet is going to hell in a handcart in the service of articulation and yet, inevitably, I shall ensure a pipe of O to hand, the better to collude with the necessary suppression, not to say the death of the planet.
Helen is quiet.
As for George, I accepted an invite to dinner. He allowed me to know the Thai friend will be cooking for us. I pictured George and I licking madly from the same bowl.
Friday, 22 February 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
Hi there, I enjoy your blog.
-Rory
Oh Rory, need you be so insincere?
Yet how can I complain? Thank you for visiting, I get few enough visitors. I used to have more, but there was a period recently when someone went around claiming to be me. I think he put a few people off the blog.
Regards to you.
Helen.
Somehow I've got a Helen Hayes Farewell to Arms in my mind's eye for your Helen.
That can't be right.
I think Rory spends his days visiting blogs and dropping the same comment everywhere like pigeon shit.
As if we were about to follow his trail.
Actually. Why not. I have a fondness for pigeon shit, as long as it isn't splattering on me.
Post a Comment